|
| |
California lawmakers seek delay in forcing immigrants' return to
Vietnam
http://patrick.guenin2.free.fr/cantho/vnnews08/delay.htm
As confusion and fear swirl around a new agreement to send illegal immigrants
and criminals back to their native Vietnam, California legislators, led by U.S.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, have asked the federal government to delay the pact's
implementation.
"It is appalling and unbelievable that this administration would even
consider returning those who escaped communism back to the clutches of the very
communists that they escaped," Lofgren, D-San Jose, wrote in a letter to
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. U.S. Rep. Mike
Honda, D-Campbell, and Barbara Lee, D-Oakland, and 11 other legislators also
signed the letter. The Department of Homeland Security has not responded to
Lofgren's letter, but a spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
said the agency will issue a response soon. Lofgren's concerns about reprisal
echo sentiments expressed by some Vietnamese emigres in San Jose, which has more
people of Vietnamese ancestry than any city outside of Vietnam.
Cuong Nguyen, a spokesman for the Vietnamese Embassy, said, "Returnees have
always been treated humanely." Added Nguyen: "There exists no
discrimination or maltreatment." But Lofgren, citing a 2006 U.S. State
Department report, said Vietnam restricts religious, political and press
freedoms and has been accused by human rights groups of abusing suspects in
detention. The agreement signed by Washington and Hanoi last week also caused
anxiety among Vietnamese-Americans in the Bay Area because of confusion over who
is affected. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that struck
the agreement with Hanoi, said that Vietnamese nationals who arrived on or after
July 12, 1995, face repatriation.
That affects about 1,500 immigrants and includes those who overstayed student or
tourist visas, immigration officials said. It also includes legal immigrants who
are being deported for criminal convictions. Initially, the Department of
Homeland Security, the agency that oversees ICE, said 8,000 Vietnamese faced
deportation. But more than 6,500 other Vietnamese who have also been ordered
deported - but who arrived before July 1995 - do not face repatriation under the
new agreement, said Kelly Nantel, a spokeswoman for ICE, trying to clarify the
agreement's terms. Most of the 6,500 have criminal convictions and have been
ordered deported previously. But they will remain in immigration limbo for now
because they have been ordered deported but can't be sent back to Vietnam
because the country refuses to accept them. "The date in the agreement is
the line in the sand," Nantel said. "There isn't a plan for us to move
that date backward." But not everyone is so sure.
Legal experts and many Vietnamese who have old deportation orders fear that the
new agreement is the beginning of a government effort to repatriate more
Vietnamese in the future. "I worry a lot," said Dung Ha, a nail salon
worker in Stockton who has a brother and sister in San Jose. "Right now I'm
OK. I'm scared for the future." Ha, 47, arrived from Vietnam in 1991 with
his wife and children. But in 2000, while living in Lodi, Ha was convicted of
sexual assault. He was sentenced to a year in prison and was in immigration
detention for another year, then ordered deported. Like many Vietnamese in the
same situation, Ha was paroled by the immigration service because it couldn't by
law detain him indefinitely, or return him to Vietnam. "I don't care about
myself," he said. "I'm old. They'll treat me badly. But I worry about
leaving my family." Ha's wife and three sons have since become U.S.
citizens.
The agreement is scheduled to take effect in two months and will be valid for
five years. Many immigration advocates, meanwhile, raise questions about the
government's intentions. "It's not very clear and it's rather
confusing," said Minh Steven Dovan, a criminal defense attorney in San Jose
who has represented Vietnamese nationals. "I think the administration is
trying to cast a wide net to cover as many cases as possible." As in Ha's
case, family members of Vietnamese facing deportation - legal immigrants and
U.S. citizens - will also be hurt by the new agreement, said Sin-Yen Ling, a
staff attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, a legal aid group that has fielded
dozens of calls and queries about the new agreement. "Those who have worked
hard, who have turned their lives around," Ling said, "could lose
everything they've worked for - and their families."
By Jessie Mangaliman - The Mercury News - February 7, 2008.
|
FOODOFVIETNAM.COM